Friday, June 24, 2011

Razorback Dolphin

The Razorback Dolphin is a descendant of the Common Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) which has converged upon 'River Dolphins'. This isn't as unlikely as might be supposed as T. truncatus is not just pelagic, but also occurs in bays, estuaries, and the lower reaches of rivers (Reeves et al. 2002); individuals even live in the Rio de Ais (Stolen and Barlow 2003). Like the ancestral species, this species has normal-sized eyes, non-paddle-shaped flippers, and a falcate (first) dorsal fin; the beak length, large melon, and body shape appear closer in morphology to Inia or Platanista. I could imagine some rather strange things happening internally in the melon region - it's the cetacean thing to do. Taken together, these features suggest an animal adapted for riverine habits which is still capable of competing in brackish and near-shore marine waters. Ais, after all, does not have an extensive river system which can support an entire species, maybe a sub-population at best.

And there are dorsal finlets. Presumably these formed through a similar genetic pathway as the thunniform dolphin's extra fins despite the radically different body plans and habitats of the species. It's tempting to give the Razorback and Thunniform dolphin a common T. truncatus ancestor, although I suspect these would be too neat and tidy for evolution.

The primary inspiration for this species is once again a cryptid, the Sawtooth Dolphin observed by Jeremy Wade. The individual probably got its appearance from an injury, and I could imagine the coincidental appearance of the Razorback Dolphin causing some confusion for whoever is exploring Ais.


Reeves, R. R., Stewart, B. S., Clapham, P. J., and Powell, J. A. (2002) National Audubon Society Guide to Marine Mammals of the World. Alfred A. Knopf: New York.

Stolen, M. K., and Barlow, J. (2003). A model life table for Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) from the Indian River Lagoon System, Florida U.S.A. Marine Mammal Science 19(4), 630-649. Available.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

The Many-Finned Dolphin

Cetaceans are undoubtedly the strangest of mammals, and I don't find an extra dorsal fin or 'anal fin' to be all that improbable compared with, say, the Sperm Whale's nose, the Narwhal's tusk, or Odobenocetops in general. An extra dorsal fin is not without precedent thanks to the Cornish Bottlenose Snooky, and there have been other sightings of supernumerarily-finned cetaceans, some of which reportedly looked quite unlike known species (see Raynal and Sylvestre (1991) for a review). Rather than a surviving cryptid, the speculative dolphin above is a descendant from a Lagenorhynchus species (maybe L. albirostris or L. acutus) which has taken its thunniform body shape to new extremes. The coloration and shapes of the head and foreflipper are the result of blending together a few Lagenorhynchus species, however the body shape is inspired by Dall's Porpoise, Pilot Whales, Eastern Spinner Dolphin, and scombrid fishes. The general working theory here is that since since the keels already resemble low dorsal fins in some cases, perhaps with some selection they could develop into proper fins.

This is of course not a final draft and could be subject to major change - I could see the extra fin forming separately from a keel (probably losing the 'anal fin'), the males exhibiting a forward-canting (first) dorsal fin like Dall's Porpoise and the Spinner Dolphin, sexual dimorphism resulting in other changes in fin shape and coloration, and a shifting phylogenetic identity. At any rate, there's still going to be an extra-finned cetacean in this final project, and it may very well not be the strangest cetacean out there.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

That is not dead which can eternal lie...

Ais is far from dead, just quiet. It turns out that keeping up a steady stream of very in-depth articles can't easily co-exist with other obligations, but it doesn't mean further conceptualization has ceased. To clarify, we're going to be re-tooling this blog into a catalogue of our concept art. There's no guarantee that the contents of this blog will closely resemble the (hopefully!) published form, however I'd wager to say the overall spirit will be the same.

And now, some old context-free images I pulled off my hard drive:

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Great Snapper

Gamerachelys monstrosus
(Monstrous Gamera-Turtle)

The specific name 'monstrosus' is well deserved for Gamerachelys as it is not only one of the largest turtles to have lived, but an apex predator as well. Great Snappers exhibit pronounced sexual size dimorphism; females from Ais have an average carapace length of 0.85 m, total length of 2.55 m, and weight of 145 kg; their male counterparts have an average carapace length of 1.30 m, total length of 3.9 m, and weight of around 550 kg. Specimens from Ais rarely exceed these sizes significantly, however the largest male reportedly had a carapace length of 1.62 m, total length of 4.89 m, and weight of over a tonne. Mainland individuals are slightly larger on average and have a comparatively extreme range of body sizes; fragmentary remains imply at least one individual had a 1.82 m carapace, 5.5 m total length, and implied weight of over 1.5 tonnes.

1.8 m tall human with 0.85 m female, 1.30 m male, and 1.82 m male - all measurements in Strait Carapace Length.

While the Great Snapper overlaps in size with the Anthropocene Alligator Snapping Turtle, Macrochelys temminckii, it is a direct descendant of the smaller Common Snapping Turtle, Chelydra serpentina. The latter species, while not sympathetic to humans and hunted by them to a degree, proved secretive and adaptable enough to thrive in altered and degraded environments. When a macropredatory niche held by crocodilians recently became vacated, it is likely a combination of aggression, mobility, adaptability, and ability to handle armored prey such as loricariids and turtles, gave the Common Snapper-descendants the upper hand against Pythons and Alligator Snapper competitors. As the Great Snapper antecessor evolved larger body size, it became immune to virtually all predation and forced the pythons into more specialized niches.

Ais and/or the adjacent mainland was likely the seat of the Great Snapper's evolution, but the species has spread to all sufficient habitat on the mainland from the tropics to high temperature latitudes. A sister species occurs on the continent to the South. Great Snapper are capable of crossing considerable distances in the Ocean (at least 50 km) and have colonized numerous isolated islands. Seas are not the normal habitat of the Great Snapper, which is most commonly found in estuaries, swamps, lakes, and streams. Large males leave the water only rarely, but females are capable of crossing considerable distances over land to reach isolated bodies of water. It appears that the smaller size of the females is due primarily because of their need to cross land and lay eggs.

Great Snappers look like scaled-up versions of their ancestors, but exhibit some significant differences. Their heads are proportionally longer and more robust, with a prominent hook-like beak. Jaw strength is disproportionately great, which allows them to crush large armored prey and bones. The eyes are more dorsally oriented than their ancestor and the nostrils are at the end of a snorkel-like structure. The neck is longer and thicker than that of the Common Snapper, about 1/3 of the total length, and is typically retracted only before striking prey. The head and anterior portion of the neck cannot be drawn into the shell. To protect the unarmored structure, the neck is covered by pointed tubercles resembling denticles. The carapace is proportionally long, flat, and narrow with strongly pronounced bosses and reliefs. The shell is covered with algae, which provides camouflage. The limbs are highly developed and the primary source of underwater locomotion. The shell is highly apomorphic; it is approximately a third of the total length, very thick, and covered with three rows of serrated ridges; it is capable of being folded several times and when held against substrate, allows the turtle to 'spring' a shocking distance towards prey out of the neck's reach, such as those on land. The distance covered is subequal to that of the extinct crocodilians, possibly due to the recent specialization and sheer mass of the animal.

Gamerachelys has a very wide range of prey items, although they vary with the size of the Snapper. Younger individuals consume invertebrates such as molluscs and insect larvae, but start supplementing their diet with vertebrates as they grow larger. There are few species of fish, reptiles, birds, or mammals which can escape predation from Gamerachelys, however it is not certain what the outcome of a particularly large specimen meeting a 'nomad morph' Titan Pleco would be. Other large loricariids are, however, on the menu for the Great Snapper. Any vertebrate in or near the water is potential prey, although insufficiently small prey is ignored unless conditions become very poor. While on land, the Great Snapper will not hesitate to ambush any proximate animals. Carrion is also consumed, which the turtles are capable of detecting with their formidable sense of smell. Plant material is taken on occasion, most of which is fruit which had fallen into water.

Adult Great Snapper have no predators to fear, although fights between individuals of the strongly territorial species can result in fatalities and subsequent cannibalism. Hatchlings and immature individuals have numerous predators such as carnivorans, monitors, other turtles, wading birds, predatory fish, and others. Mortality rates are extreme in the first months of life, so enormous clutches compensate for this phenomenon.

Behind the Scenes:

While a (primarily) freshwater turtle capable of reaching similar sizes as the Saltwater Crocodile Crocodylus porosus, even larger turtles existed in the past. Stupendemys geographicus, a sidenecked turtle from the Late Miocene/Early Pliocene of Northern South America reached at least a carapace length of 3.18 meters, or 10'5", and may have been a bottom-dwelling predator [1]. The Eocene softshell Drazinderetes tethyensis had a 2 m total carapace length and is also likely one of the largest turtles ever [2]. Considering the number of recovered specimens, it is likely such sizes are not abnormal - plus, it is strongly suggestive of Great Snapper-sized being well within the realm of physical possibility.

The driving force behind the evolution of the Great Snapper is 'Evolutionary Relay', a process in which similar characteristics are acquired in a similar environment at different times. While crocodilians were reasonably successful in the region that was to become Ais, regional extinctions occurred due to competition with large introduced snakes and egg-pilferers, giving Common Snappers an opportunity to step into the recently vacated niche. The convergence is not extreme to the degree for the Great Snapper to be considered an 'Elvis Taxa', however.


[1]. Bocquetin, J. and Melo, J. (2006). Stupendemys souzai sp. nov. (Pleurodira, Podocnemididae) from the Miocene-Pliocene of the Solimoes Formation, Brazil. Rev. Bras. Paleontol. 9(2), 187-192.

[2]. Head, J., et al. (1999). Drazinderetes tethyensis, a new large trionychid (Reptilia: Testudines) from the Marine Eocene Drazinda Formation of the Sulaiman Range, Punjab (Pakistan). Contribution from the Museum of Paleontology 30(7), 199-214.

Monday, February 1, 2010

Longsnout Copotone

Frendoconcha accipenserinus
(Sturgeon-like Shell Crusher)

This large, anadromous catfish is a member of the clade Loricariidae, a group which can be readily distinguished by extensive armor and a suctorial mouth. The Longsnout Copotone and relatives, informally called the 'molluscivorous loricariid clade', are descendants from one or more of the Pterygoplichthys species which had a strong propensity for biological invasion. That is the limit of what can be stated authoritatively about the evolution of the molluscivores, as the Pterygoplichthys radiation is recent and chaotic to the degree that long branch attraction, homoplasies, and unexpected gene transfers make every phylogenetic analysis highly divergent from the one before. As the Longsnout Copotone inhabits sub-tropical and temperate waters far beyond the Ais archipelago, this suggests that it may not be a part of the loricariid radiation indigenous to that region. The aptly-named Titan Pleco is similar to the molluscivorous loricariids as it also has an anadromous life cycle, highly dexterous barbels, and the facultative ability to crush molluscs, however the adaptations for feeding on floating vegetation and unusual fin reductions/modifications suggest it is a distant relative at best.

1.75 m human with 1.25 m SL and 2 m SL specimens.

Adult Longsnout Copotone exhibit no sexual size dimorphism and average 1.25 m SL (1.5 TL) and 20 kg on Ais. Specimens as large as 2 m SL (likely ~2.5 m TL, 95+ kg)  have been recorded in the open ocean adjacent to Ais, although it is likely that the individuals were transients beyond the carrying capacity of the archipelago. The size and armor of this species make it nearly immune to predation at even modest sizes, although there is a tradeoff of reduced speed and agility as well as heavy parasitism. Parasite fauna mostly consists of species shared with the Titan Pleco and other molluscivorous loricariids, although genetic analysis may reveal them to be cryptic species. It has been theorized that a very large ambush-predatory turtle and large carnivoran specializing on near-shore prey may represent a threat to the Longsnout Copotone, but predation events are probably very uncommon as the biomes inhabited by the predators are not frequented by the fish. Due to the relaxed predation, healthy adults develop considerable and highly polymorphic carotenoid coloration usually consisting of orange/yellow spots and stripes.

The Longsnout Copotone inhabits large rivers, brackish waters, and the open ocean so long is there is sufficient productivity. Adult F. accipenserinus are specialized for feeding on moderate to large molluscs and crustaceans, which are dug out (if necessary), handled by a suckermouth and highly dexterous barbels, crushed with molar-like teeth, and picked apart before consumption. Although highly effective, the suckermouth feeding strategy tightly constrains the size range of prey that can be taken; for instance the similarly-sized and closely related F. setadon has a proportionally enormous suckermouth capable of tackling the prey that F. accipenserinus can't. The Longsnout Copotone is by no means limited to shelled prey and can also take benthic fishes (including small loricariids), plant matter, and annelid worms. Juveniles, incapable of digging out or handling such large prey, feed on aquatic insects such as plecopterans and ephemeropterans before heading downstream. Predation pressure and competition from other benthic feeders is considerable at that early life stage, with only a tiny fraction of juveniles making it anywhere near adult sizes.

Geography of the main island of Ais, Ais archipelago, and adjacent mainland GTI. The main island is approximately the size of modern-day Flores.

Biomes of Ais. Note that numerous small streams and ponds exist below the scale that can be shown.

Longsnout Copotone endemic to Ais, along with the occasional transient, migrate to large interior lakes in early spring to reproduce. Males briefly duel with outsized cheek-spines to assert dominance, fertilize the eggs of nearby females, and both genders abandon the eggs to return to their feeding grounds shortly thereafter. The large transients are often dominant in these arenas, but it appears that phenotypic plasticity keeps their offspring at the average size. Hybrids with F. setadon have been recorded, although this bizarre looking progeny appears to have lower fitness than either parent species.

Although rare on Ais, with perhaps 500-1000 individuals, the Longsnout Copotone is in no risk of extinction on the archipelago due to consistent gene flow and the tendency of adult specimens to live and reproduce for decades.

Behind the Scenes:
While it is not uncommon for some Speculative Evolution projects to include animals which are likely the product of "hey, wouldn't it be neat if X evolved into X?" - the evolution of the Longsnout Copotone is not as unreasonable as surface details may suggest. Loricariids already have roughly sturgeon-like morphology and habitat, and it is certainly worth noting that another clade of benthic armored fishes, poachers (Agonidae), have produced species that look and function essentially like small sturgeons (e.g. Podothecus accipenserinus). 

No extant loricariids are known to occur in salt water, but sailfin catfishes (Pterygoplichthys spp.) are exceptionally hardy and can tolerate brackish waters [1]. Fishbase lists Pterygoplichthys disjunctivus as occurring in mangroves in addition to lakes and ponds, suggesting brackish waters may be a regular habitat for that species (a likely ancestor of most Ais loricariids). As the 'molluscivorous loricariid' clade will have evolved saltwater tolerance quite recently in their history, reproductive ties to freshwater are highly unlikely to break for some time, if they ever do.

The Longsnout Copotone is considerably larger than any extant loricariid, although it is notable that even the largest specimens are utterly dwarfed by the distantly related Titan Pleco. Several loricariid clades appear to reach or exceed 1 meter in total length [2], and introduced sailfin catfishes reach at least 50 cm TL with evidence for a maximum size exceeding 70 cm [3]. Catfishes have independently evolved gigantism in numerous clades such as Bagarius yarrelli (Sisoridae), Silurus glanis (Siluridae), Pangasianodon gigas (Pangasiidae) and others, so it is certainly possible for this trend to extend to yet another group. It is unknown what factors, if any, cause frequent gigantism in catfishes. 

Loricariids generally feed by scraping algae, small invertebrates, and organic sediments from substrates [3], although it does not appear that feeding ecology has been very well researched for loricariids and aquarists note that some species can take molluscs and crustaceans (e.g. Acanthicus adonis). The suctorial mouth seems like an ideal method for handling shelled prey, although the 'molluscivorous loricariid' clade has also evolved prehensile 'barbels' (perhaps better referred to as tentacles) to aid in this feeding. Teeth in that clade are stronger and more molar-like than those of extant loricariids, but differ surprisingly little overall as their large size is sufficient in taking most prey. 

[1] Hoover, Jan Jeffrey, et al. (2004). Suckermouth Catfishes: Threats to Aquatic Ecosystems of the United States? ANSRP Bulletin 04(1). Available.

[2Quevedo, Rodrigo and Reis, Roberto E. (2002). Pogonopoma obscurum: A New Species of Loricariid Catfish (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from Southern Brazil, with Comments on the Genus PogonopomaCopeia 2002, 402-410. Citing Schaefer, 1986.

[3] Nico, Leo G. et al. (2009). Non-Native Suckermouth Armored Catfishes in Florida: Description of Nest Burrows and Burrow Colonies with Assessment of Shoreline Conditions. ANSRP Bulletin, Vol 9(1). Available.